Sunday, May 14, 2017
All About those Nodes: Feminist Criticism
This Node was a challenge to brainstorm. Of course, I was familiar with Feminist criticism, often utilizing it was a supporting crutch to an already extant criticism which guided it; Queer Feminist, Psychoanalytic Feminist, etc. Additionally, one would figure that a Node concerning women, their treatment, and self-control would be easy to write in a story focused on a chivalric text, something which was deeply male chauvinist in nature. But the challenge wasn’t in thinking of what or how to write about feminism insofar as how I would make it interesting; at this time in the adaptation, after all, the player is focused squarely within the castle. This, obviously, limits my ability to introduce sweeping ideas relating to sociality.
But I continued thinking about it and settled on a tried and true scenario—that of a divided women’s wing.
The idea is that the player encounters a large section of the castle—the women’s wing— which is more or less a pseudo-warzone. On one side, you have the Sasürfass Sisters, our bourgeois-feminist import, while on the other side, we have the Dirt-born Undertakers, the obvious proletarian feminist import.
Meant to be philosophical in nature, the two factions war over language and body-matterism. Witht eh conflict centered on magical portraits of great female figures in history, the bourgeois-feminist faction, aside from taking a gender-essentialist notation of how the portraits should be honored and constructed, believe them to be perfect according to a common sense ideology. Their rivals, meanwhile, are keen in pointing out the flaws which each portrait represented and how more than mere honoring should be done, how there is a mission outside of the women’s wing and it concerns economic emancipation and class conflict.
Central to this Node will be the time-honored strands of feminist theory which have been enshrined in academia; ideas such as the male gaze, the Images of Women, Womanism and Intersectionality, Phallogocentric language, all make an appearance in addition to the aforementioned language struggle and body-matterism.
In terms of events, I have outlined a few situations for the player to intake. In one part of the women’s wing, there is a spectator which literally commodifies women, another in which a school room whips students who dare and demystify the reactionary nature of the bourgeois-feminist scripts, while at another locale, there is a reformist group of women who have tried to build a broad alliance of feminist elements into a cohesive whole; however, this reformist alliance, though having their heart in the right place, is in vicious opposition to another third-faction, one which has opposed all notions of gender and sex and acts as the true revolutionary vanguard—opposing both the sisters and the undertakers as two sides of the same coin.
I think part of the reason why this Node was difficult to imagine was because this was the first Node where I had to shift gears. Prior to this Node, I had license to imagine much due to the exterior nature of those Nodes. AS a result, I do feel that this Node is a bit stilted. At the same time, though, I feel it does have a kind of vibrancy which the other Nodes lack—especially the Deconstruction ones; this Node, I should mention, is categorized as deconstruction. Prior to this, the only deconstruction Node which the player would have encountered was the Eco-Criticism Node: whereas that Node was closed, mysterious, and lonely, this Node is the exact opposite—it is lively, extroverted, and immersed in the world of sophistication and theory. If I do it well, I hope this Node is something that people keep on coming back to. But, even so, I am willing to continue working on this Node, making some fine tuning here and there even after I have completed it. After all, the idea of these Nodes is to give the player a fast-paced yet lively introduction into the theory at hand, and that does nobody any good if that introduction is not on par with the other Nodes.
Charlemagne was long lived and the most influential Carolingian king. Born in 768 and dead in 814, he reigned for over forty years. Ind...
Here are some different kinds of posts. Enjoy. Don't say that I never did anything for you. Part of any blog worth reading and ens...
I like spiral fractals. Hello everyone, Just another short post informing you on the dynamics of this blog. As you have likely not...
Stephen Colbert: contemporary warrior-poet? Not really. In fact, this is not what we are even talking about, per se. When we think of ...